31 December 2006

Superman II as you have never seen it



After Superman Returns left a bad taste in my mouth, I felt the desire to cleanse my palate. Fellow Media Brother Mikey recommended a review of the Christopher Reeve Superman movies, plus something new and exciting: Superman II - The Richard Donner Cut (also available on HD DVD)


Now, for your average movie viewer, this special edition of Superman II is likely to be a disappointment. But if you're as interested in the business and craft of movie making as I am, you will find this a fascinating examination of an alternate vision of this classic film.


For those not in the know, Richard Donner was the director of the original Superman - The Movie. This film and its sequel were conceived and written as a single story. The plan was to film the complete story at once, but to edit two separate movie releases from the footage. The story had been constructed with a nice climax and cliffhanger toward the middle to support this. This was the job Richard Donner had signed on for.


Unfortunately, as sometimes happens in Hollywood, budgets and egos came into conflict with the artistic vision. The producers, worried about budget overruns and return on their massive investment, short-circuited this plan near the end of production and insisted that the crew focus on completing just the first movie, sticking the rest in the can for a potential sequel if there was a measure of success (and any money left) from the first film.


Richard Donner completed the first film, but his conflicts with the producers led them to fire him before the second picture could be completed. They replaced him with Richard Lester, who finished out the shoot with the changes the producers demanded to conserve their investment, despite the fact that it meant significant changes to the story line and cutting Superman's father right out of the film.


Donner, having already directed the classic horror picture The Omen, went on to helm the blockbuster Lethal Weapon Series, and fans have long dreamed of what Superman II might have looked like if Donner's creative vision had made it to theaters.


We no longer have to wonder. Archival footage was retrieved from cold vaults and recut to restore, as closely as possible, the original concept of Superman II. Bogus scenes were deleted, original scenes cut from the theatrical release were added back in, and key effects shots left unfinished in the seventies were completed from the original production footage with the help of modern computer techniques. In certain instances footage was not available because it was never shot during production, but the restoration team was able to reconstruct a scene Donner considered vital by cutting in the screen tests of the original actors. A stroke of brilliant editing, I must say.


Of course, the restrictions of the restoration team, working with footage decades old shot by two different directors with differing visions, make the production value of the new edition a bit rocky and inconsistent, especially where the screen test footage breaks the continuity. But the story hangs together solidly, and it is so good that you really don't notice the rough edges until you hear Donner talking about them in the commentary.


While no studio would consider this a finished piece of work suitable for theatrical release, it is a fascinating historical document which film fans can and should study and admire.

25 December 2006

Superman Returns


Also available on HD DVD


Dreck. Utterly derivative. If there is a thin line between "homage" and "rip-off", this flick is far on the wrong side of it. The story contains barely one unborrowed thread, and it is not enough to hold up $270 million worth of special effects. Out of the two and a half hours, there were maybe fifteen minutes of action that had me engaged and excited. The rest of the time all I could think was, "Christopher Reeve did this better 30 years ago." (No offense Brandon, you didn't suck, you just weren't "him".) And I'm sorry, but Kate Bosworth (IMDB) is just too young to carry the weight of a Pulitzer winning journalist. She would have been, what, a junior in high school when Superman left? Skip it, get Reeve's version instead (or better yet, get it all in Superman Ultimate Collector's Edition).

24 December 2006

"Eragon" Review

A company related to my job sponsored a preview of the movie "Eragon", based on the book Eragon (Inheritance, Book 1).



The experience (at AMC Phipps Plaza 14): mediocre film projection, absolutely horrible sound. It went from no sound at all for the first two minutes, to mono only, to breaking from mono into surround and back every few seconds. Theater owners want to know why attendance is down? This is why.


The movie: not great. I have not read the book, but those who have tell me that the richest parts of the story were cut from the movie. I believe them, because the story as it stands in the picture is formulaic and not especially well executed. I have nothing against formula movies, in fact I think a good story can always stand a good retelling, but there simply was not enough character development to support it. The characters were more caricatures or stereotypes than living things. You could just about map every character directly onto that ultimate of (good) formula movies, Star Wars. Eragon is Luke Skywalker, Brom is Obi-wan, Arya is Leia, etc. But there is so little depth to the characters that we might not recognize them if we didn't know them from countless other stories on the same formula. Screenwriter Peter Buchman's only previous writing credit is Jurassic Park 3, not itself a stellar example of screenwriting.


On the other hand, the visual effects are quite good, as near as I could tell on the typically underlit projection. There were only a couple of shots where I thought "that looks fake". And the final battle scene is thrilling despite being poorly motivated by previous action. Costumes, sets, and cinematography were also excellent. Overall the production value was very high. Too bad the screenplay didn't put it to use.


Younger viewers and those with a less critical eye will enjoy this fantasy adventure, but at the price of theatrical admission I would recommend finding something better.

Using FBI anti-piracy warning is piracy

Oh … my … God! This is not a joke. Do not attempt to pirate the FBI anti-piracy warning, or you could go to jail!


A last word to the wise:Unauthorized use of the FBI seal, name, and initials are subject to prosecution under Federal Criminal law, including Sections 701, 709, and 712 of Title 18 of the United States Code.